Its condition is no longer what The april theses The april theses simplified was between the years andwhen Marx and Engels consciously allowed the inaccurate, opportunist term "Social-Democracy.
Lenin argued that the Communists must distinguish themselves from others who called themselves socialists and even Marxists, both inside Russia and outside, but had totally betrayed the revolutionary principles of Marxism, particularly in their social-chauvinism and support for the inter-imperialist First World War.
They outlined the nature and stage of the revolution, pointing out that the country was going through a transition from an anti-feudal, or bourgeois-democratic, revolution, that had placed the capitalists and big landowners in power, to a socialist revolution that would place power in the hands of the working class and small farmers.
And should we aid and abet that deception by retaining the old and worn-out party name, which is as decayed as the Second International? Fortunately, just in time, Lenin saw the light and caught up with Trotsky in April In fact, Trotskyism turned into a formula that was always invoked in order to establish its own purity just as it is doing now with respect to Greece.
It continued to sacrifice millions of Russian soldiers in the slaughter of the First World War by honouring the treaties to re-divide the world agreed by the Tsar with the governments of Britain and France; it did nothing to solve the acute economic crises and poverty facing the masses The april theses simplified people in Russia; nor did it take any measures to redistribute land, the most important means of a livelihood for the majority.
The whole of Russia is already being covered with a network of organs of local self-government. They highlighted the fact that the struggle for the new continued even in the period after the February March Revolution, that the masses of the people were still in motion and that their aims and interests could be met neither by a parliamentary system nor by a pro-war government which represented the interests of the monopolies, financiers and big landowners.
Who have yielded to the influence of the bourgeoisie and have been extending this influence to the proletariat as well. Who was right, and who was wrong in the debate? Essentially the state is the power exercises over the masses by a group of armed men separated from the people. In his April Theses Lenin highlighted the important role of the revolutionary party as the organiser and far-sighted leader of the working class, that can provide the class with the theory to guide its forward march.
It is now a question of the action of the masses and not merely the theories of leaders. No support for the Provisional Government; the utter falsity of all its promises should be made clear, particularly of those relating to the renunciation of annexations.
The immediate amalgamation of all banks in the country into a single national bank, and the institution of control over it by the Soviet of Workers' Deputies. Subsequently, these workers, who are Social-Democrats, are the most loyal leaders of the proletarian masses.
Fine phrases about the revolutionary people are suitable to a man like Kerensky, but not to the revolutionary proletariat. This war has brought mankind to the brink of a precipice, to the destruction of civilisation, the ruin and brutalisation of countless millions of human beings.
I write, announce and elaborately explain: Plekhanov, Kautsky and their ilk, perverted and debased Marxism. We are constantly reminded by writers in this tradition that the Bolsheviks themselves, taken as a whole, were a dull lot who stubbornly remained loyal to what they had been told yesterday, even when their brilliant and visionary leaders had moved on.
I am publishing these personal theses, provided with very short explanatory notes, which were developed in more detail in the report. After the February Revolution Lenin sought to return to Russia as soon as possible.
Unmasking, instead of admitting, the illusion-breeding "demand" that this government, a government of capitalists, cease being imperialistic. The most widespread campaign for this view must be organised in the army at the front. The April Theses] Published: As long as we are in the minority we carry on the work of criticising and exposing errors and at the same time we preach the necessity of transferring the entire state power to the Soviets of Workers Deputies, so that people may overcome their mistakes by experience.
Immediate merger of all the banks in the country into one general national bank, over which the Soviet of Workers' Deputies should have control. Are there any reasons against the new name?
Not the kind of state found in the usual, parliamentary, bourgeois, democratic republic, but rather something like the Paris Commune of and the Soviets of Workers' Deputies of and As I only arrived in Petrograd on the night of April 16, I could, of course, only on my own responsibility and admittedly without sufficient preparation render a report on April 17 on the problems of the revolutionary proletariat.
Life and the revolution have already established here in a concrete way although in a form which is still weak and embryonicthis new type of "state", though it is not really a state in the proper sense of the word.
Abolition of the police, the army and the bureaucracy. I publish these personal theses of mine with only the briefest explanatory notes, which were developed in far greater detail in the report.
There is a third reason: We ought to look forward, not backward; we ought to look away from the usual bourgeois type of democracy which has been strengthening the domination of the bourgeoisie by the means of the old, monarchistic organs of government - the police, the army, and the bureaucracy.
The most widespread campaign for this view must be organised in the army at the front. Changing the name of the party. Abolition of the police, the army, the bureaucracy. Here we are, keeping on our backs the same old soiled shirtStalin, who was a fairly high-up Bolshevik at this time – one of the top ten leaders at least – is recorded as saying in a meeting with Lenin and others that the April theses were too schematic and that they overlooked the question of small nations.
The April Theses was a document of ten points presented to the April Conference of Bolsheviks by Vladimir Lenin in The main points of the April Theses were to focus Bolshevik efforts on. April Theses, Russian Aprelskiye Tezisy, in Russian history, program developed by Lenin during the Russian Revolution ofcalling for Soviet control of state power; the theses, published in Aprilcontributed to the July Days uprising and also to the Bolshevik coup d’etat in October May 30, · Lenin delivering April Theses at meeting of the Bolshevik Party held in the Tauride Palace in Petrograd on April 17, (April 4 in the old Russian calendar), one day after returning from exile April 16 (April 3 in the old Russian calendar) marked the centenary of the return to Russia from exile of V.I.
Lenin. Home» » April Crisis» April Crisis Texts» April Thesis. April Thesis. Vladimir Lenin, The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution.
April 17, No support must be given to the Provisional Government; the utter falsity of all its promises must be explained, particularly those relating to the renunciation of. Lenin's The April Theses () [Published in Pravda, No.
26, 7 April ]. I did not arrive in Petrograd until the night of April 3, and therefore at the meeting on April 4 I could, of course, deliver the report on the tasks of the revolutionary proletariat only on my own behalf, and .Download